Extraordinary Style; Gimmicky Plot
David Fincher’s Se7en (1995) is one of those movies that I have to
talk about on two different planes: one in terms of plot, the other in terms of
visual style.
I don’t hate the plot of Se7en,
but I don’t love it either. Although I will admit to having a secret love of
religious-based serial killers (my hatred of religion feels even more justified
every time there’s some religious fanatic who decides to start killing people
in the name of his merciful god), this one feels a bit on the gimmicky, cliché side.
I think maybe this is an unfortunate side-effect of the popularity of The Silence of the Lambs and the
brilliance of the Hannibal Lecter character. After that movie, everyone wanted
to create the next highly-literate, charismatic madman. But the literary
allusions in Se7en feel forced and
contrived, causing the effect to fall flat. Furthermore, the idea that the
government keeps track of library cards is rather ludicrous. Even in today’s
post-9/11, Patriot Act paranoia, the idea reeks of Oliver Stone-levels of
conspiracy theory. The overall result is a story that struggles to allow us to
maintain our suspension of disbelief. It is still possible, however, to
understand and appreciate the movie Se7en
as a modern morality parable. When looked at in this light, the suspension of
disbelief shifts with the expectation of the genre. We expect our crime stories
to be realistic; a parable or a fable has a lot more wiggle room on the
believability scale. It becomes much easier to overlook the un-reality of the
show, if your generic expectations allow you to accept a certain level of
un-reality.Another place where I think Fincher missed a really golden opportunity was in waiting for a third-act entrance of Kevin Spacey as the criminal mastermind. Spacey’s flair for playing the twisted psychopath is (as is evidenced in The Usual Suspects (Singer, 1995)) is wasted on what amounts to little more than a cameo role. Pitting Morgan Freeman and Kevin Spacey against each other in an on-screen battle of wits would have produced, in my opinion, a much more satisfying plot.
But for all its plotting faults, Se7en is a visually stunning movie of extraordinary style. While
many critics have accused it over being overly gory and lacking the finesse and
subtlety of suspense masters like Hitchcock, who used what NOT shown every bit
as much as what WAS shown to create their sense of horror, I think the
atmosphere created by Fincher’s highly stylized form is masterful. The film
contains impossibly dark, gritty images that create an almost suffocating sense
of urban decay to match the film’s theme of moral degradation. The crumbling
buildings, dark interiors, striking contrasts, and rain-washed streets echo
back to the equally-stylized noir film—films that were also infamous for their exploration
of the less-savory side of the human race.
Overall, Se7en is
a pretty good movie. Although the plot contrivances could have put me off, they didn’t because I was able to see the
film as a parable, rather than an actual retelling. Once I was able to overcome
that, I could settle in and enjoy the spectacular visuality of the film form.
I'm interested in what you said about the introduction of John Doe. That scene in the car always stood out as one of my favorites, and when I watch it I get the vibe that Morgan Freeman's character is scared of Spacey. Or maybe even in a bit of awe? Their wits have sort of been circling each other for the entire movie so on some level I think that Freeman's character knows he can't handle Spacey's rationalization.
ReplyDeleteSo I guess I'm leaning both ways? I would love to see some back and forth between the two, but because it's so short their interaction seems to pack a bigger punch.
I wonder if there were any deleted scenes?